|
Post by malleodei on Dec 12, 2013 14:28:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Flitzerbiest on Dec 12, 2013 15:02:02 GMT -6
It goes beyond all of our understanding. I don't have any comment on the validity of the theory. What I can say is that string theory is interesting in that it is a "math first" approach from the theoretical (as opposed to the empirical/observational) side of physics. String theorists, instead of progressing from observation to mathematics, are seeking out equations that "work". As such, string physics' Achilles heel is a lack of confirmatory evidence. In their defense, strings, if they exist in fact--and I don't think theorists care--they are way, way, way too small to be seen. It's a novel approach, and apparently (to people who understand what the hell string theorists are talking about) shows a lot of promise.
My only personal exposure to this is a few scattered articles for the popular scientific literature and one book by string apologist Brian Greene.
|
|
|
Post by stevec on Dec 12, 2013 15:37:31 GMT -6
Like FB, I really can't offer any commentary on researcher's claim. I only lived near and circled around the Institute for Advanced Study's event horizon in Princeton, never really being sucked into it with my minivan. I've read several articles and a compresensive book(can't remember the title) on string theory, branes, and alternate universes. I wish i could offer a layman's interpretation, but it really is beyond my mental abilities.
Do you suspect that scientists interpreting the universe as a hologram consider the universe as any less real?
|
|
|
Post by malleodei on Dec 12, 2013 15:50:00 GMT -6
I don't know. I'm not even sure what he meant by hologram. It's all very confusing to me. I;m just an Engineer. I deal with things like steel, valves, mechanical actuators and such. It's beyond my pay grade, but I doubt that he meant to question whether or not the universe was real. That seems more like a philosophical question rather than a scientific one.
|
|
|
Post by Flitzerbiest on Dec 12, 2013 16:20:17 GMT -6
You're an engineer? You probably know more about holograms than us rubes.
|
|
|
Post by malleodei on Dec 13, 2013 8:25:42 GMT -6
Well, not me, at least. I mean. I know what a hologram is, but have no idea what this means in terms of the Universe. I'm a mechanical engineer. The industry that I work in isn't quite that hi-tech. We do high temperature metals processing equipment and manufacturing so it often involves hot and dirty factories.
|
|
|
Post by Flitzerbiest on Dec 13, 2013 13:49:24 GMT -6
Well, think "projection of a second, distant reality through local dimensions". Without going to Webster, that's about the limits of my understanding.
|
|